Pages

Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Blood thirsty baby killers

Baby killers?

I must be talking about soldiers, right? War criminals who shoot villagers and kill their kids?
That is what the lefty college hippies with pink and green braids paint on their staples brand protest signs... right?

Well, WRONG.

I am not writing about our men and women in uniform. I would not dream of labelling an entire profession of warriors war criminals and murderers. Most of them would never kill a child or follow orders to do so.  I stand among their numbers and know this to be true.

No, I am writing about the industrial baby killers.

The abortion on demand (AOD) lobby.

What do I mean by abortion on demand? I mean the advocates of abortion who claim it is a woman's right to kill her unborn for whatever reason she (can be convinced) is valid.
Not to save her life (always legal), but to save her bank account or her career. To save her parents shame, or her boyfriends reputation, or her marriage from infidelity. The AOD lobby doesn't even care if abortion is used as a birth control measure in a culture that promotes promiscuity and premarital sex in the classroom.

Their entire argument, they claim,  is about 'choice'. The child inside the woman - even if it has a penis - is just part of the woman, they say. Case after case of the most horrific kind have surfaced in this industry. 'Doctor' Kurt Gosnell in Philadelphia being the latest. 
To the advocates having an abortion is not different than having a tumour removed.
In fact they refuse to even call the baby a baby. Instead it is named by it's developmental stage; it becomes a foetus. A human foetus, but  merely a part of a woman's anatomy.
A human being perhaps, but not yet a legal 'person'. It would be akin to saying newborns aren't people.
In fact that is EXACTLY what they are now saying.

Now that abortion has become a legal INDUSTRY that generates hundreds of millions (much of it tax payers money), they have raised the bar - much like opponents have being said they would for decades.


As science has progressed and the facts surrounding human development in the womb clearly proves the humanity and rapid development of the unborn, these people have turned the scientific and ethical reality on it's head: Instead of conceding a horrible error and opposing the industry, they argue that if an unborn child is a baby, they state, then killing babies should be legal too.

This evil madness is spreading.
We hear legal and academic arguments all over the 'civilized' (read hedonist) regions of the world that newborns and even infants should be put on their kill list. (see a quick google of the a mere handful of the advocates)
They argue that because an infants brain (the materialist soul) is not functioning like an adults that they are not legally 'persons', and that it should therefore be legal for the mother to have that child killed in much the same way you can have a dog or cat put 'to sleep'. Their actual soul? Their worth? Not even considered. These people do not believe in such things. Their God is wealth and power over others.

If a child is difficult, has disabilities or 'disorders' -the advocates claim - it is a kindness to 'put them down'. But this, they argue, is still to restrictive. It is about 'choice' remember? So any reason is good enough to legally kill your newborn or toddler, provided it is done by one of their 'professionals'.
If appeased, these measures would make Gosnell's case moot. His snipping of delivered babies spines would be perfectly okay by law.

The laws of these lands protect freedom of speech they preach this in our courts, universities, and even in medical journals - with no consequence. An idea that would have seen them hung by a mob only fifty years ago is now 'respectable'.
Our younger generations are being indoctrinated into thinking this is 'normal'.
Killing toddlers is now a real, legal debate.

If a reader of this post does not see murder of babes as evil, I would urge them to look into the eyes of their child, their young siblings, or relatives and imagine what it would be like to come home one day and discover that their relatives, spouse or partner had killed their little one.
If you still see no wrong in THAT you yourself are utterly lost.
I ask such people to come back into the fold of humanity. A person who calls other humans (including our babies) things or animals is LESS than an animal themselves. You sell your soul (humanity, if you like) for a blatant lie. Wake up and become human again.

If, on the other hand, the idea of desperate women being convinced that the killing of their OWN infants is just and moral,  is an act of evil: Allow me to sink into another deep pit of hellish thought.

Currently there are legal arguments being made in Florida by the biggest abortion provider in the western world: Planned Parenthood.
These arguments state that if one of the many botched late term abortion results in the live birth of the child that is wrong to legally ensure that child receives medical attention. They are arguing that the decision of whether the child (now born and conscious) should be killed or not should be up to the 'mother and the doctor'. This works well for them, as it becomes more and more apparent that many late term abortions are exactly what is in question here. Baby is delivered and killed in cold blood. (The 'kind' and currently legal - in most areas-  alternative is having their little heads caved in and sucked out my a machine.)

Having survived the infanticidal dementia of the mother and the bloody lucre of the 'doctor' , the child is to be killed in it's first moments of consciousness. When she should be mewling and snuggling on mummy's breast she will be injected with noxious chemicals and die terrified and alone, and the hands of a professional butcher of human beings.
This, in the eyes of the abortion industry, is just and moral.
This is a 'right' and this is a 'choice'.

I should also note:  There is also a very real racial and sexual element to this. The children being 'aborted' are by vast majority black children and girls in general.
The industry operates full steam in the urban 'black ghettos' and among the more affluent classes sex selective abortion is rampant. Baby girls are aborted so the wealthy parents can 'try again' for a son.

Sound like something from Red China or Nazi Germany, folks? Sure it does, but it isn't.
It is the UNITED STATES. The 'leaders of the free world'.
Canada, my own home I have served and love.
The EU, in the cradle of western civilization.
Even in Israel, the land of the exodus - and the sanctuary of the very people who escaped the Nazi holocaust.

Our TAX dollars are paying for these ghouls to make their insane arguments and carry on their evil, bloody work.
Evil has no borders, no boundaries.
It is alive and well among our own peoples, and if normal people like you and me do not begin to speak out about this ever growing sacrifice of innocent life - it will continue to flourish and bloom among us.
Already we see the same arguments of death being forwarded about the sick, weak, and elderly.
Even if your motivations are selfish or nationalistic you must ask yourself: How long can such an empire of blood and lust last? How long till an honest and moral culture cuts our decadent, weak, selfish and murderous shadow of a civilization to bits?
We must change this path, or it will be changed for us.
Mark my words on this.

Finally I will add a personal note: Many of you reading this will think because I am Christian this is my religious view; that I am part of a camp of extreme thought fostered in religious circles.
I assure you: That is totally untrue.
I was 'pro choice' for more than half my life.
I was a dupe too, despite my faith and being a father.
I will agree my stance is consistent with Christian thought, but it does not require one to be a Christian; simply HUMAN and aware.

It is the SCIENCE and the act educating myself on what an abortion really is and looks like that has opened my eyes. Most people never see the results of an abortion. Most people never see the human toll on the mother. I have now seen both. I cannot relate that horror.
But I can react to it, and I have. I now stand firmly with the child's (human) rights, and not with those of selfish, bloody, convenience.

Again, I implore you on this Easter weekend and during this Passover: Speak up.
Open your eyes and see what is being done in every city and town across the free world.
Listen to and read the words of these blood thirsty, selfish, people. See for yourself the future they 'plan' for our children and grandchildren. Hear from the horse's mouth what they have in store.
Be brave and look at the images of the slaughtered innocents (WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC IMAGES).

Speaking out will not make you popular with many 'liberal' friends, I know.
But it must be done. They must hear it too.
We (conservatives, libertarians, liberals, socialists etc) all have very different visions of what society should be like - but we ALL love our children. We all want to see the children happy and well. Liberals have been lied to. They need to be shown the truth, too.

Remember: Do not become violent against the advocates of death, or you play into their hands. These people seek to paint us all as extremists, religious nutjobs, and terrorists. They seek to draw us into their realm of madness.
If we are to do this we must seek life, as they defend death.
We must seek  to change the law, while they seek to enrich themselves to killing the young, old, weak, sick, unborn and mentally handicapped.
We must fight evil with goodness, not violence and more death.

Rather, speak out, vote against, and DEMAND action against this industry of innocent blood. Demand that your tax monies do not fuel their sacrificial pyre.
Demand an accounting for those people who run this industry and promote it as 'women's rights' and choice, while contributing to a global femicide and conditioning a generation of people to react with hostility when abortion is even QUESTIONED or discussed.
Further,  teach your children that sex and love must go together; and that child rearing is a great responsibility. Teach them that the taking of innocent life is the most horrible transgression against humanity and God, and should only occur under the most extreme circumstances - when it cannot be avoided. In doing so you can counter the poison being fed to them by the advocates of death.

For the babies, infants, the unborn and all that is decent and good, I beg you dear readers: Wake up and stand against these killers of babes and would be killers of little children before it is too late.

May God bless you and keep you this Easter weekend.
May He watch over us in this struggle for what is good and right.
May He take the souls of these innocents speedily to His side.


May you all have a wonderful holiday, which ever you celebrate, with your children and grandchildren.
Give them an extra hug and remember all those little ones that did not make it to mother's arms.



For my sons. 









Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Red sky at Dawn....



For years the military in the West warned of an Islamic revival and new coalition of burgeoning Asian military powers - nobody listened. We were called nuts, extremists, and paranoid. Then 9/11 hit and suddenly we were all heroes. Today we see a Nuclear North Korea and an Iran about to join that club of non aligned (enemy) nations with Nuclear weaponry.... but we were 'paranoid'?
Now another warning bell is sounding - this one about a threat very close to home.
Will be we 'crazy paranoids' again?

An extremely disturbing article from the daily caller by M-Gen Jerry Curry, United States Army Ret.
I, for one, hope he is paranoid.... but if so - why the deafening silence on the subject in the media and by the administration in Washington?

 
Who Does The Government Intend To Shoot?

By Major General Jerry Curry, USA (Ret.) 
The Social Security Administration (SSA) confirms that it is purchasing 174 thousand rounds of hollow point bullets to be delivered to 41 locations in major cities across the U.S.  No one has yet said what the purpose of these purchases is, though we are led to believe that they will be used only in an emergency to counteract and control civil unrest. Those against whom the hollow point bullets are to be used — those causing the civil unrest — must be American citizens; since the SSA has never been used overseas to help foreign countries maintain control of their citizens.
What would be the target of these 174, 000 rounds of hollow point bullets? It can’t simply be to control demonstrators or rioters. Hollow point bullets are so lethal that the Geneva Convention does not allow their use on the battle field in time of war. Hollow point bullets don’t just stop or hurt people, they penetrate the body, spread out, fragment and cause maximum damage to the body’s organs. Death often follows.
Potentially each hollow nose bullet represents a dead American. If so, why would the U.S. government want the SSA to kill 174,000 of our citizens, even during a time of civil unrest? Or is the purpose to kill 174,000 of the nation’s military and replace them with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) special security forces, forces loyal to the Administration, not to the Constitution?
All my life I’ve handled firearms. When a young boy growing up on my father’s farm in Pennsylvania Dad’s first rule of firearms training was, “Never point a gun at someone, in fun or otherwise, unless you intend to shoot them. If you shoot someone, shoot to kill.” I’ve never forgotten his admonition. It stayed with me through my Boy Scout training, when I enlisted in the army as a Private to fight in the Korea
War, during my days as a Ranger and Paratrooper and throughout my thirty-four year military career.
If this were only a one time order of ammunition, it could easily be dismissed. But there is a pattern here. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has ordered 46,000 rounds of hollow point ammunition. Notice that all of these purchases are for the lethal hollow nose bullets.  These bullets are not being purchased and stored for squirrel or coyote hunting. This is serious ammunition manufactured to be used for serious purposes.
In the war in Iraq, our military forces expended approximately 70 million rounds per year. In March DHS ordered 750 million rounds of hollow point ammunition. It then turned around and ordered an additional 750 million rounds of miscellaneous bullets including some that are capable of penetrating walls. This is enough ammunition to empty five rounds into the body of every living American citizen. Is this something we and the Congress should be concerned about? What’s the plan that requires so many dead Americans, even during times of civil unrest? Has Congress and the Administration vetted the plan in public.
I fear that Congress won’t take these ammunition purchases seriously until they are all led from Capitol Hill in handcuffs. Why buy all this ammunition unless you plan to use it. Unknown to Congress, Does DHS plan to declare war on some country? Shouldn’t Congress hold hearings on why the Administration is stockpiling this ammunition all across the nation? How will it be used; what are the Administration’s plans?
Obama is a deadly serious, persistent man. Once he focuses on an object, he pursues it to the end. What is his focus here? All of these rounds of ammunition can only be used to kill American citizens, though there is enough ammunition being ordered to kill, in addition to every American citizen, also every Iranian, Syrian or Mexican. There is simply too much of it. And this much ammunition can’t be just for training, there aren’t that many weapons and “shooters” in the U.S. to fire it. Perhaps it is to be used to arm illegal immigrants?
We have enough military forces to maintain law and order in the U.S. even during times of civil unrest.
We have local police, backed up by each state’s National Guard, backed up by the Department of Defense. So in addition to all these forces why does DHS need its own private army? Why do the SSA, NOAA and other government agencies need to create their own civilian security forces armed with hollow nose bullets?
Were I the JCS, and if I wasn’t already fully briefed on this matter, I’d stop the purchase of hollow point bullets, ask the secretary of Defense why all this ammunition is being purchased and spread around the country? If I got answers like the ones Congress got during the investigation of Operation Fast and Furious – I’d start tracking all ammunition deliveries nationwide to find out what organizations and units are using them, for what purpose and, if it is not constitutional, prepare to counteract whatever it is that they are doing.
This is a deadly serious business. I hope I’m wrong, but something smells rotten. And If the Congress isn’t going to do its duty and investigate this matter fully, the military will have to protect the Constitution, the nation, and our citizens.
Jerry Curry is a decorated combat veteran, Army Aviator, Paratrooper, and Ranger, who for nearly forty years has served his country both in the military and as a Presidential political appointee.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/17/who-does-the-government-intend-to-shoot/#ixzz24qEONDCp

************************************
Below you will find a video that supports giving the police these rounds, but that clearly shows the lethality of them.
Obviously I stand with M-Gen Curry on this issue. My view is that police are civil servants, not soldiers to be deployed against a civilian population - and so do not agree with the premise of this propaganda video... but the demonstration of the difference is perfect for our purposes here on this blog.
Does a US Law enforcement agency, and environmental agency, and a transportation security agency (all fairly new) need 750 MILLION of these rounds? If so, to use on WHO and what for?



Saturday, February 18, 2012

A victory for 'freedom to worship over intolerant secularism'

Seems the tide is shifting in Britain!
From the UK's DAILYMAIL:

Town hall chiefs have been handed the power to hold prayers at the start of council meetings in defiance of the courts.
Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles yesterday signed an order giving local authorities the right to maintain the centuries-old tradition.
He stepped in after the High Court last week backed a controversial campaign to abolish acts of worship during town  hall meetings.
Christians and politicians reacted with dismay after a judge banned a council in Devon from putting prayers on the formal agenda. Atheist former councillor Clive Bone started the case against Bideford Town Council in July 2010, claiming he had been ‘disadvantaged and embarrassed’ when prayers were recited.
However, Mr Pickles signed a Parliamentary Order yesterday that should render the judgment irrelevant and protect the freedom for councils to pray.
He said the Government’s Localism Act allows councils to do  anything an individual can unless specifically prohibited by law.

The right to pray can be exercised by major local authorities in England from today, and by parish councils by the end of March.

Mr Pickles said reversing the ‘illiberal ruling’ was a victory for ‘localism over central interference’ and ‘freedom to worship over intolerant secularism’. [my emph]

Prime Minister David Cameron has urged people to remember that the UK is a Christian nation and Tory Party Chairman Sayeeda Warsi gave a speech at the Vatican this week saying Europe should speak up for Christianity. [Her Majesty] The Queen also voiced her most outspoken and personal defence of faith this week.

The intervention is also part of a simmering row between politicians and the judiciary over so-called ‘judicial activism’.
Ministers have grown increasingly frustrated by judges over interpreting the law to deliver verdicts which are widely regarded as lacking common sense.
Judges are widely accused of seeking to make law themselves in areas like human rights legislation.



Pickles for PM! 

ORIGINAL:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102915/Eric-Pickles-signs-order-let-councils-say-prayers-meetings.html#ixzz1mk8Pi2iR

Monday, February 13, 2012

FIrst the banner, now the oath....

Cheered on by their victory over the the various town square Santas, School grad ceremnonies, Military funerals and grave-sites,  and of course the 'prayer banner' of Cranston HS; the Atheist movement has now set it's sites on the US pledge of allegiance.


A family has reportedly asked a Massachusetts judge to order a school district to remove the phrase "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance.
Interestingly enough, the plaintiffs, who are atheists and call themselves the "Does" to protect their identity, are not citing the establishment clause of the First Amendment in making their case. Instead, they are challenging the Pledge on the basis of the Massachusetts Constitution's guarantee of "equal protection."
The Does argue that schools discriminate against atheist children by taking part in a pledge that makes them feel “marginalized,” the Boston Herald reports.
Superior Court Judge Jane Haggerty will hear arguments Monday in Doe vs. Acton-Boxborough Regional School District.
In another challenge against saying the Pledge of Allegiance in Brookline Mass., a group called "Brookline Pax" had asked the town to vote in favor of a resolution calling for the school committee to rescind its Pledge of Allegiance policy and stop the Pledge from being recited in the schools.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/13/family-asks-judge-to-order-massachusetts-school-district-to-remove-under-god/?test=latestnews#ixzz1mIwu3Pkk


So, because a few kids have fringe beliefs that make them feel 'left out' they want to alter or even SCRAP this oath?