Warning: EXTREMELY Graphic detail.
Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts
Saturday, April 13, 2013
Saturday, March 30, 2013
Blood thirsty baby killers
Baby killers?
I must be talking about soldiers, right? War criminals who shoot villagers and kill their kids?
That is what the lefty college hippies with pink and green braids paint on their staples brand protest signs... right?
Well, WRONG.
I am not writing about our men and women in uniform. I would not dream of labelling an entire profession of warriors war criminals and murderers. Most of them would never kill a child or follow orders to do so. I stand among their numbers and know this to be true.
No, I am writing about the industrial baby killers.
The abortion on demand (AOD) lobby.
What do I mean by abortion on demand? I mean the advocates of abortion who claim it is a woman's right to kill her unborn for whatever reason she (can be convinced) is valid.
Not to save her life (always legal), but to save her bank account or her career. To save her parents shame, or her boyfriends reputation, or her marriage from infidelity. The AOD lobby doesn't even care if abortion is used as a birth control measure in a culture that promotes promiscuity and premarital sex in the classroom.
Their entire argument, they claim, is about 'choice'. The child inside the woman - even if it has a penis - is just part of the woman, they say. Case after case of the most horrific kind have surfaced in this industry. 'Doctor' Kurt Gosnell in Philadelphia being the latest.
To the advocates having an abortion is not different than having a tumour removed.
In fact they refuse to even call the baby a baby. Instead it is named by it's developmental stage; it becomes a foetus. A human foetus, but merely a part of a woman's anatomy.
A human being perhaps, but not yet a legal 'person'. It would be akin to saying newborns aren't people.
In fact that is EXACTLY what they are now saying.
Now that abortion has become a legal INDUSTRY that generates hundreds of millions (much of it tax payers money), they have raised the bar - much like opponents have being said they would for decades.
As science has progressed and the facts surrounding human development in the womb clearly proves the humanity and rapid development of the unborn, these people have turned the scientific and ethical reality on it's head: Instead of conceding a horrible error and opposing the industry, they argue that if an unborn child is a baby, they state, then killing babies should be legal too.
This evil madness is spreading.
We hear legal and academic arguments all over the 'civilized' (read hedonist) regions of the world that newborns and even infants should be put on their kill list. (see a quick google of the a mere handful of the advocates)
They argue that because an infants brain (the materialist soul) is not functioning like an adults that they are not legally 'persons', and that it should therefore be legal for the mother to have that child killed in much the same way you can have a dog or cat put 'to sleep'. Their actual soul? Their worth? Not even considered. These people do not believe in such things. Their God is wealth and power over others.
If a child is difficult, has disabilities or 'disorders' -the advocates claim - it is a kindness to 'put them down'. But this, they argue, is still to restrictive. It is about 'choice' remember? So any reason is good enough to legally kill your newborn or toddler, provided it is done by one of their 'professionals'.
If appeased, these measures would make Gosnell's case moot. His snipping of delivered babies spines would be perfectly okay by law.
The laws of these lands protect freedom of speech they preach this in our courts, universities, and even in medical journals - with no consequence. An idea that would have seen them hung by a mob only fifty years ago is now 'respectable'.
Our younger generations are being indoctrinated into thinking this is 'normal'.
Killing toddlers is now a real, legal debate.
If a reader of this post does not see murder of babes as evil, I would urge them to look into the eyes of their child, their young siblings, or relatives and imagine what it would be like to come home one day and discover that their relatives, spouse or partner had killed their little one.
If you still see no wrong in THAT you yourself are utterly lost.
I ask such people to come back into the fold of humanity. A person who calls other humans (including our babies) things or animals is LESS than an animal themselves. You sell your soul (humanity, if you like) for a blatant lie. Wake up and become human again.
If, on the other hand, the idea of desperate women being convinced that the killing of their OWN infants is just and moral, is an act of evil: Allow me to sink into another deep pit of hellish thought.
Currently there are legal arguments being made in Florida by the biggest abortion provider in the western world: Planned Parenthood.
These arguments state that if one of the many botched late term abortion results in the live birth of the child that is wrong to legally ensure that child receives medical attention. They are arguing that the decision of whether the child (now born and conscious) should be killed or not should be up to the 'mother and the doctor'. This works well for them, as it becomes more and more apparent that many late term abortions are exactly what is in question here. Baby is delivered and killed in cold blood. (The 'kind' and currently legal - in most areas- alternative is having their little heads caved in and sucked out my a machine.)
Having survived the infanticidal dementia of the mother and the bloody lucre of the 'doctor' , the child is to be killed in it's first moments of consciousness. When she should be mewling and snuggling on mummy's breast she will be injected with noxious chemicals and die terrified and alone, and the hands of a professional butcher of human beings.
This, in the eyes of the abortion industry, is just and moral.
This is a 'right' and this is a 'choice'.
I should also note: There is also a very real racial and sexual element to this. The children being 'aborted' are by vast majority black children and girls in general.
The industry operates full steam in the urban 'black ghettos' and among the more affluent classes sex selective abortion is rampant. Baby girls are aborted so the wealthy parents can 'try again' for a son.
Sound like something from Red China or Nazi Germany, folks? Sure it does, but it isn't.
It is the UNITED STATES. The 'leaders of the free world'.
Canada, my own home I have served and love.
The EU, in the cradle of western civilization.
Even in Israel, the land of the exodus - and the sanctuary of the very people who escaped the Nazi holocaust.
Our TAX dollars are paying for these ghouls to make their insane arguments and carry on their evil, bloody work.
Evil has no borders, no boundaries.
It is alive and well among our own peoples, and if normal people like you and me do not begin to speak out about this ever growing sacrifice of innocent life - it will continue to flourish and bloom among us.
Already we see the same arguments of death being forwarded about the sick, weak, and elderly.
Even if your motivations are selfish or nationalistic you must ask yourself: How long can such an empire of blood and lust last? How long till an honest and moral culture cuts our decadent, weak, selfish and murderous shadow of a civilization to bits?
We must change this path, or it will be changed for us.
Mark my words on this.
Finally I will add a personal note: Many of you reading this will think because I am Christian this is my religious view; that I am part of a camp of extreme thought fostered in religious circles.
I assure you: That is totally untrue.
I was 'pro choice' for more than half my life.
I was a dupe too, despite my faith and being a father.
I will agree my stance is consistent with Christian thought, but it does not require one to be a Christian; simply HUMAN and aware.
It is the SCIENCE and the act educating myself on what an abortion really is and looks like that has opened my eyes. Most people never see the results of an abortion. Most people never see the human toll on the mother. I have now seen both. I cannot relate that horror.
But I can react to it, and I have. I now stand firmly with the child's (human) rights, and not with those of selfish, bloody, convenience.
Again, I implore you on this Easter weekend and during this Passover: Speak up.
Open your eyes and see what is being done in every city and town across the free world.
Listen to and read the words of these blood thirsty, selfish, people. See for yourself the future they 'plan' for our children and grandchildren. Hear from the horse's mouth what they have in store.
Be brave and look at the images of the slaughtered innocents (WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC IMAGES).
Speaking out will not make you popular with many 'liberal' friends, I know.
But it must be done. They must hear it too.
We (conservatives, libertarians, liberals, socialists etc) all have very different visions of what society should be like - but we ALL love our children. We all want to see the children happy and well. Liberals have been lied to. They need to be shown the truth, too.
Remember: Do not become violent against the advocates of death, or you play into their hands. These people seek to paint us all as extremists, religious nutjobs, and terrorists. They seek to draw us into their realm of madness.
If we are to do this we must seek life, as they defend death.
We must seek to change the law, while they seek to enrich themselves to killing the young, old, weak, sick, unborn and mentally handicapped.
We must fight evil with goodness, not violence and more death.
Rather, speak out, vote against, and DEMAND action against this industry of innocent blood. Demand that your tax monies do not fuel their sacrificial pyre.
Demand an accounting for those people who run this industry and promote it as 'women's rights' and choice, while contributing to a global femicide and conditioning a generation of people to react with hostility when abortion is even QUESTIONED or discussed.
Further, teach your children that sex and love must go together; and that child rearing is a great responsibility. Teach them that the taking of innocent life is the most horrible transgression against humanity and God, and should only occur under the most extreme circumstances - when it cannot be avoided. In doing so you can counter the poison being fed to them by the advocates of death.
For the babies, infants, the unborn and all that is decent and good, I beg you dear readers: Wake up and stand against these killers of babes and would be killers of little children before it is too late.
May God bless you and keep you this Easter weekend.
May He watch over us in this struggle for what is good and right.
May He take the souls of these innocents speedily to His side.
May you all have a wonderful holiday, which ever you celebrate, with your children and grandchildren.
Give them an extra hug and remember all those little ones that did not make it to mother's arms.
I must be talking about soldiers, right? War criminals who shoot villagers and kill their kids?
That is what the lefty college hippies with pink and green braids paint on their staples brand protest signs... right?
Well, WRONG.
I am not writing about our men and women in uniform. I would not dream of labelling an entire profession of warriors war criminals and murderers. Most of them would never kill a child or follow orders to do so. I stand among their numbers and know this to be true.
No, I am writing about the industrial baby killers.
The abortion on demand (AOD) lobby.
What do I mean by abortion on demand? I mean the advocates of abortion who claim it is a woman's right to kill her unborn for whatever reason she (can be convinced) is valid.
Not to save her life (always legal), but to save her bank account or her career. To save her parents shame, or her boyfriends reputation, or her marriage from infidelity. The AOD lobby doesn't even care if abortion is used as a birth control measure in a culture that promotes promiscuity and premarital sex in the classroom.
Their entire argument, they claim, is about 'choice'. The child inside the woman - even if it has a penis - is just part of the woman, they say. Case after case of the most horrific kind have surfaced in this industry. 'Doctor' Kurt Gosnell in Philadelphia being the latest.
To the advocates having an abortion is not different than having a tumour removed.
In fact they refuse to even call the baby a baby. Instead it is named by it's developmental stage; it becomes a foetus. A human foetus, but merely a part of a woman's anatomy.
A human being perhaps, but not yet a legal 'person'. It would be akin to saying newborns aren't people.
In fact that is EXACTLY what they are now saying.
Now that abortion has become a legal INDUSTRY that generates hundreds of millions (much of it tax payers money), they have raised the bar - much like opponents have being said they would for decades.
As science has progressed and the facts surrounding human development in the womb clearly proves the humanity and rapid development of the unborn, these people have turned the scientific and ethical reality on it's head: Instead of conceding a horrible error and opposing the industry, they argue that if an unborn child is a baby, they state, then killing babies should be legal too.
This evil madness is spreading.
We hear legal and academic arguments all over the 'civilized' (read hedonist) regions of the world that newborns and even infants should be put on their kill list. (see a quick google of the a mere handful of the advocates)
They argue that because an infants brain (the materialist soul) is not functioning like an adults that they are not legally 'persons', and that it should therefore be legal for the mother to have that child killed in much the same way you can have a dog or cat put 'to sleep'. Their actual soul? Their worth? Not even considered. These people do not believe in such things. Their God is wealth and power over others.
If a child is difficult, has disabilities or 'disorders' -the advocates claim - it is a kindness to 'put them down'. But this, they argue, is still to restrictive. It is about 'choice' remember? So any reason is good enough to legally kill your newborn or toddler, provided it is done by one of their 'professionals'.
If appeased, these measures would make Gosnell's case moot. His snipping of delivered babies spines would be perfectly okay by law.
The laws of these lands protect freedom of speech they preach this in our courts, universities, and even in medical journals - with no consequence. An idea that would have seen them hung by a mob only fifty years ago is now 'respectable'.
Our younger generations are being indoctrinated into thinking this is 'normal'.
Killing toddlers is now a real, legal debate.
If a reader of this post does not see murder of babes as evil, I would urge them to look into the eyes of their child, their young siblings, or relatives and imagine what it would be like to come home one day and discover that their relatives, spouse or partner had killed their little one.
If you still see no wrong in THAT you yourself are utterly lost.
I ask such people to come back into the fold of humanity. A person who calls other humans (including our babies) things or animals is LESS than an animal themselves. You sell your soul (humanity, if you like) for a blatant lie. Wake up and become human again.
If, on the other hand, the idea of desperate women being convinced that the killing of their OWN infants is just and moral, is an act of evil: Allow me to sink into another deep pit of hellish thought.
Currently there are legal arguments being made in Florida by the biggest abortion provider in the western world: Planned Parenthood.
These arguments state that if one of the many botched late term abortion results in the live birth of the child that is wrong to legally ensure that child receives medical attention. They are arguing that the decision of whether the child (now born and conscious) should be killed or not should be up to the 'mother and the doctor'. This works well for them, as it becomes more and more apparent that many late term abortions are exactly what is in question here. Baby is delivered and killed in cold blood. (The 'kind' and currently legal - in most areas- alternative is having their little heads caved in and sucked out my a machine.)
Having survived the infanticidal dementia of the mother and the bloody lucre of the 'doctor' , the child is to be killed in it's first moments of consciousness. When she should be mewling and snuggling on mummy's breast she will be injected with noxious chemicals and die terrified and alone, and the hands of a professional butcher of human beings.
This, in the eyes of the abortion industry, is just and moral.
This is a 'right' and this is a 'choice'.
I should also note: There is also a very real racial and sexual element to this. The children being 'aborted' are by vast majority black children and girls in general.
The industry operates full steam in the urban 'black ghettos' and among the more affluent classes sex selective abortion is rampant. Baby girls are aborted so the wealthy parents can 'try again' for a son.
Sound like something from Red China or Nazi Germany, folks? Sure it does, but it isn't.
It is the UNITED STATES. The 'leaders of the free world'.
Canada, my own home I have served and love.
The EU, in the cradle of western civilization.
Even in Israel, the land of the exodus - and the sanctuary of the very people who escaped the Nazi holocaust.
Our TAX dollars are paying for these ghouls to make their insane arguments and carry on their evil, bloody work.
Evil has no borders, no boundaries.
It is alive and well among our own peoples, and if normal people like you and me do not begin to speak out about this ever growing sacrifice of innocent life - it will continue to flourish and bloom among us.
Already we see the same arguments of death being forwarded about the sick, weak, and elderly.
Even if your motivations are selfish or nationalistic you must ask yourself: How long can such an empire of blood and lust last? How long till an honest and moral culture cuts our decadent, weak, selfish and murderous shadow of a civilization to bits?
We must change this path, or it will be changed for us.
Mark my words on this.
Finally I will add a personal note: Many of you reading this will think because I am Christian this is my religious view; that I am part of a camp of extreme thought fostered in religious circles.
I assure you: That is totally untrue.
I was 'pro choice' for more than half my life.
I was a dupe too, despite my faith and being a father.
I will agree my stance is consistent with Christian thought, but it does not require one to be a Christian; simply HUMAN and aware.
It is the SCIENCE and the act educating myself on what an abortion really is and looks like that has opened my eyes. Most people never see the results of an abortion. Most people never see the human toll on the mother. I have now seen both. I cannot relate that horror.
But I can react to it, and I have. I now stand firmly with the child's (human) rights, and not with those of selfish, bloody, convenience.
Again, I implore you on this Easter weekend and during this Passover: Speak up.
Open your eyes and see what is being done in every city and town across the free world.
Listen to and read the words of these blood thirsty, selfish, people. See for yourself the future they 'plan' for our children and grandchildren. Hear from the horse's mouth what they have in store.
Be brave and look at the images of the slaughtered innocents (WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC IMAGES).
Speaking out will not make you popular with many 'liberal' friends, I know.
But it must be done. They must hear it too.
We (conservatives, libertarians, liberals, socialists etc) all have very different visions of what society should be like - but we ALL love our children. We all want to see the children happy and well. Liberals have been lied to. They need to be shown the truth, too.
Remember: Do not become violent against the advocates of death, or you play into their hands. These people seek to paint us all as extremists, religious nutjobs, and terrorists. They seek to draw us into their realm of madness.
If we are to do this we must seek life, as they defend death.
We must seek to change the law, while they seek to enrich themselves to killing the young, old, weak, sick, unborn and mentally handicapped.
We must fight evil with goodness, not violence and more death.
Rather, speak out, vote against, and DEMAND action against this industry of innocent blood. Demand that your tax monies do not fuel their sacrificial pyre.
Demand an accounting for those people who run this industry and promote it as 'women's rights' and choice, while contributing to a global femicide and conditioning a generation of people to react with hostility when abortion is even QUESTIONED or discussed.
Further, teach your children that sex and love must go together; and that child rearing is a great responsibility. Teach them that the taking of innocent life is the most horrible transgression against humanity and God, and should only occur under the most extreme circumstances - when it cannot be avoided. In doing so you can counter the poison being fed to them by the advocates of death.
For the babies, infants, the unborn and all that is decent and good, I beg you dear readers: Wake up and stand against these killers of babes and would be killers of little children before it is too late.
May God bless you and keep you this Easter weekend.
May He watch over us in this struggle for what is good and right.
May He take the souls of these innocents speedily to His side.
May you all have a wonderful holiday, which ever you celebrate, with your children and grandchildren.
Give them an extra hug and remember all those little ones that did not make it to mother's arms.
For my sons.
Friday, November 02, 2012
Saturday, October 27, 2012
The Gay Gene and the Abortion Clinic
Extract from 'The Essential guide to 21st and 22nd century History' by Javier Weintraub the famed Texan Scholar.
The year is AD 2030 / 1451 Hijri
Hakim and is wife are pregnant.
They have found out about a new non-invasive technology that will allow them to determine if the baby will be male, female, autistic, have a cleft palate ...or is in possession of the newly discovered 'gay gene' - all without any risk of miscarriage.
Hakim is most concerned about the health and sex of the child.
It must be a perfectly healthy boy.
He has explained to his pregnant wife she will need to abort and try again, if the child is not male.
Hakim's wife is a 'good' wife.
She is his second of three.
She is obedient, as her culture teaches her to be and she naturally agrees to Hakim's demands.
She asks him if she can have a daughter one day, and he agrees - after 2 sons and as long as it occurs naturally.
Once the first set of results are returned, Hakim is delighted to discover the child is a boy.
But, much to his horror a gene associated with male femininity and in some cases homosexual tendencies is discovered just a few days later.
The OB's have located the 'gay gene' in his wife's fluids.
Hakim struggles with this. None of his other boys are gay? Are they?
Perhaps it is his wife's fault? More tests may confirm this!
Luckily for his wife and sons, Hakim does not fully believe in the gene's effect.
Still, he considers, a gay son would be a nightmare to raise in his culture.
What IF the doctors are right?
If the boy was found out, his life would be in danger and Hakim's family shamed for generations. Reluctantly he decides to abort the male unborn baby.
His wife complies, admitting it is probably her fault and she abandons her dream of having a daughter forever. In Hakim's country abortions are only legal for very serious illnesses and 'moral' reasons like incest, rape... and homosexuality.
A year later they have the 'perfect boy'.
Hakim is thankful for the 'science' that allowed this choice to be made. A few years later, his second wife quietly takes her own life, still broken hearted after losing her first baby.
Hakim's case is not rare or even culturally isolated. Nor is his wife's.
Since the 'gay gene' was identified in the 2022, millions of potentially gay or lesbian children have been aborted all over the world, especially in the western or 'free world' were abortions can be had on demand and with no reason given since the late 20th century. After effects of such 'terminations' such as depression, drug use, and even suicide are not unusual in that region either. Rather they have been considered the 'norm' for decades.
"I don't hate gays, I just want grandchildren." is the popular excuse people make initially.
There is resistance to 'bio ethics' push - and it comes from a somewhat ironic, if obvious source.
Religious minds.
The various Christian churches, ministries, and Jewish temples and religious groups are openly mocked by the media and called homophobic for insisting the science is not good, or that homosexuality is a choice and not a medical condition.
The 'religious argument', as it was then known, that we are all sinners or in a more secular language that we are all imperfect, and that such sin or imperfections must be forgiven is spun by the media and scientific elites as being silly and counter productive.
Doctor William Osborne of the Dawkins Institute for a Progressive Society (London) was famously quoted (circa 2031) as countering this argument at a United Nations meeting with: "The scientific community does not deal in sin, we deal in fact. The fact is that a defective genetic code can be repaired, and the frequency of it's recurrence be reduced and eventually eradicated by sterilization and termination. Evolution has shown us the way. Now science will follow nature! "
Public Ads read:"Counselling wont stop hate! Genetic therapy is the answer." is the answer from the scientific community.
A famous western bio ethicist* proclaim: "Soon we will eliminate so called 'homophobia' and the instinctive violence against homosexuals by eliminating the error in the genetic code that make the homosexuals deviate from evolutionary norms. Eventually we hope to find what makes people hate defects so much, and eliminate that too - but this is a start..."
Gay pride groups applaud their new 'disability status' and collect their benefits in the western nations. A small fringe of homosexual activists are publicly opposed to the new definitions and entitlement programs - but they are labelled radical and outlawed in many regions.
The 'Gay lists' are drawn up. Homosexuals registered for benefits and assigned various levels of workplace counselling - and when young enough - a free, but compulsory, genetic therapy course to attempt to correct 'defective urges'.
By 2045 the voluntary sterilization program is in effect for all homosexuals in nations with a mandatory health care act/law. The program pays 'genetic homosexuals' a years salary to get 'fixed'.
The program was ineffective, but was widely supported for almost 20 years.
Thankfully, when the technocracy broke down in the last years of the 21st century , these issues were revisited.
[...]
The role of Reverend Thomas Winston Smith, the famous civil rights leader - and later the Episcopal Bishop of Tennessee, simply cannot be underestimated.
His famous speech at the American South Eastern congress in 2089 was heralded as the 'deal breaker' on scientific racism, the neo-eugenics movement then known as 'boi ethics', and the scientific persecution of homosexuals.
His famous voicecast will forever renowned as a major civil rights victory in 'Old Dixie' and across the United States. The speech received a standing ovation from the crowds present; including then President Sir Gerald Robert Lee - the famed General, long time Ambassador to Ottawa, - who counted Rev Smith as one of his closest friends as supporters.
Rev Smith had said: "[...] and so we must cut the chains of this so called science in the name of morality and decency. We must recognize a man is not his race, his breeding, or his education - he is a result of his choices. He possess Free Will!
Being a homosexual is not a medical condition, Brothers and Sisters. These people do not need genetic therapy or to be treated like mental patients. They are not sick!
[...]It [being homosexual] is a choice. A choice that we, here in this congregation, may or may not understand fully, but it is a choice sometimes made out of love. That much we know.
We must respect that choice - the one made out of love!
And if we cannot agree with it - we are commanded to forgive it.
We are all made in God's image. More so, we are all sinners and none of us perfect.,
We will be forgiven as we forgive others.'[...]
Obviously these techniques and the science behind them were flawed, as homosexuals are just as present in modern 23rd century society as they have ever been, as evidenced by famed and loved personalities such as the ever popular Guy Mustafa - Cohen, president of the Island of Quebec or the super talented Californian artist and song writer Tony Bush and his Dare Devil base jumping lover Jean Trudea-Obama. [...]
Today [ad 2226 / 1653 Hijri date of print] we all accept the reality of free will, and that a homosexual is making what was once, before the last eugenics push, referred to as a 'lifestyle choice'. Today homosexuals enjoy the same freedoms and rights as anyone else - and none are being sent to the alchemists lab to have their life codex experimented on. Today science has it's place as a tool, and is used by the thinkers - not the reverse.
[...]
Today, happily, the machines work for us, not us for them.
Today we are happy to confront questions as profound as choice and morality with humility.
We realize our tools and methods are imperfect, and we proceed with, some would suggest, much more care. But the cost of this hubristic period in terms of human life and dignity have been incalculable.
[...]
Some suggest that the sheer loss of life to these programs could have seriously delayed colonization efforts in Antarctica and in the inner solar system by decades. One such work, 'The Malthusian Deception' by Bernard Marx, goes much further. It suggests that this loss of life is the reason for the 'blight' of the mid 21st century, and the genetic banks of these 'mad scientists' may well have been what gave rise to the killer moulds in the first place. More research is needed to confirm Dr Marx ideas, but it does seem that he has a very strong argument so far.
As Nathaniel Jackson the famous Australian pilot and the first man on Mars was once quoted as saying to his mirror.
"Who made who? Well do me in, man - we KNOW it wasn't you!"
This except is from a larger work of satirical 'prehistory' by your most Faustian author.
 |
| Image is for educational purposes only. Fair use. |
Hakim and is wife are pregnant.
They have found out about a new non-invasive technology that will allow them to determine if the baby will be male, female, autistic, have a cleft palate ...or is in possession of the newly discovered 'gay gene' - all without any risk of miscarriage.
Hakim is most concerned about the health and sex of the child.
It must be a perfectly healthy boy.
He has explained to his pregnant wife she will need to abort and try again, if the child is not male.
Hakim's wife is a 'good' wife.
She is his second of three.
She is obedient, as her culture teaches her to be and she naturally agrees to Hakim's demands.
She asks him if she can have a daughter one day, and he agrees - after 2 sons and as long as it occurs naturally.
Once the first set of results are returned, Hakim is delighted to discover the child is a boy.
But, much to his horror a gene associated with male femininity and in some cases homosexual tendencies is discovered just a few days later.
The OB's have located the 'gay gene' in his wife's fluids.
Hakim struggles with this. None of his other boys are gay? Are they?
Perhaps it is his wife's fault? More tests may confirm this!
Luckily for his wife and sons, Hakim does not fully believe in the gene's effect.
Still, he considers, a gay son would be a nightmare to raise in his culture.
What IF the doctors are right?
If the boy was found out, his life would be in danger and Hakim's family shamed for generations. Reluctantly he decides to abort the male unborn baby.
His wife complies, admitting it is probably her fault and she abandons her dream of having a daughter forever. In Hakim's country abortions are only legal for very serious illnesses and 'moral' reasons like incest, rape... and homosexuality.
A year later they have the 'perfect boy'.
Hakim is thankful for the 'science' that allowed this choice to be made. A few years later, his second wife quietly takes her own life, still broken hearted after losing her first baby.
Hakim's case is not rare or even culturally isolated. Nor is his wife's.
Since the 'gay gene' was identified in the 2022, millions of potentially gay or lesbian children have been aborted all over the world, especially in the western or 'free world' were abortions can be had on demand and with no reason given since the late 20th century. After effects of such 'terminations' such as depression, drug use, and even suicide are not unusual in that region either. Rather they have been considered the 'norm' for decades.
"I don't hate gays, I just want grandchildren." is the popular excuse people make initially.
There is resistance to 'bio ethics' push - and it comes from a somewhat ironic, if obvious source.
Religious minds.
The various Christian churches, ministries, and Jewish temples and religious groups are openly mocked by the media and called homophobic for insisting the science is not good, or that homosexuality is a choice and not a medical condition.
The 'religious argument', as it was then known, that we are all sinners or in a more secular language that we are all imperfect, and that such sin or imperfections must be forgiven is spun by the media and scientific elites as being silly and counter productive.
Doctor William Osborne of the Dawkins Institute for a Progressive Society (London) was famously quoted (circa 2031) as countering this argument at a United Nations meeting with: "The scientific community does not deal in sin, we deal in fact. The fact is that a defective genetic code can be repaired, and the frequency of it's recurrence be reduced and eventually eradicated by sterilization and termination. Evolution has shown us the way. Now science will follow nature! "
Public Ads read:"Counselling wont stop hate! Genetic therapy is the answer." is the answer from the scientific community.
A famous western bio ethicist* proclaim: "Soon we will eliminate so called 'homophobia' and the instinctive violence against homosexuals by eliminating the error in the genetic code that make the homosexuals deviate from evolutionary norms. Eventually we hope to find what makes people hate defects so much, and eliminate that too - but this is a start..."
Gay pride groups applaud their new 'disability status' and collect their benefits in the western nations. A small fringe of homosexual activists are publicly opposed to the new definitions and entitlement programs - but they are labelled radical and outlawed in many regions.
The 'Gay lists' are drawn up. Homosexuals registered for benefits and assigned various levels of workplace counselling - and when young enough - a free, but compulsory, genetic therapy course to attempt to correct 'defective urges'.
By 2045 the voluntary sterilization program is in effect for all homosexuals in nations with a mandatory health care act/law. The program pays 'genetic homosexuals' a years salary to get 'fixed'.
The program was ineffective, but was widely supported for almost 20 years.
Thankfully, when the technocracy broke down in the last years of the 21st century , these issues were revisited.
[...]
The role of Reverend Thomas Winston Smith, the famous civil rights leader - and later the Episcopal Bishop of Tennessee, simply cannot be underestimated.
His famous speech at the American South Eastern congress in 2089 was heralded as the 'deal breaker' on scientific racism, the neo-eugenics movement then known as 'boi ethics', and the scientific persecution of homosexuals.
His famous voicecast will forever renowned as a major civil rights victory in 'Old Dixie' and across the United States. The speech received a standing ovation from the crowds present; including then President Sir Gerald Robert Lee - the famed General, long time Ambassador to Ottawa, - who counted Rev Smith as one of his closest friends as supporters.
Rev Smith had said: "[...] and so we must cut the chains of this so called science in the name of morality and decency. We must recognize a man is not his race, his breeding, or his education - he is a result of his choices. He possess Free Will!
Being a homosexual is not a medical condition, Brothers and Sisters. These people do not need genetic therapy or to be treated like mental patients. They are not sick!
[...]It [being homosexual] is a choice. A choice that we, here in this congregation, may or may not understand fully, but it is a choice sometimes made out of love. That much we know.
We must respect that choice - the one made out of love!
And if we cannot agree with it - we are commanded to forgive it.
We are all made in God's image. More so, we are all sinners and none of us perfect.,
We will be forgiven as we forgive others.'[...]
Obviously these techniques and the science behind them were flawed, as homosexuals are just as present in modern 23rd century society as they have ever been, as evidenced by famed and loved personalities such as the ever popular Guy Mustafa - Cohen, president of the Island of Quebec or the super talented Californian artist and song writer Tony Bush and his Dare Devil base jumping lover Jean Trudea-Obama. [...]
Today [ad 2226 / 1653 Hijri date of print] we all accept the reality of free will, and that a homosexual is making what was once, before the last eugenics push, referred to as a 'lifestyle choice'. Today homosexuals enjoy the same freedoms and rights as anyone else - and none are being sent to the alchemists lab to have their life codex experimented on. Today science has it's place as a tool, and is used by the thinkers - not the reverse.
[...]
Today, happily, the machines work for us, not us for them.
Today we are happy to confront questions as profound as choice and morality with humility.
We realize our tools and methods are imperfect, and we proceed with, some would suggest, much more care. But the cost of this hubristic period in terms of human life and dignity have been incalculable.
[...]
Some suggest that the sheer loss of life to these programs could have seriously delayed colonization efforts in Antarctica and in the inner solar system by decades. One such work, 'The Malthusian Deception' by Bernard Marx, goes much further. It suggests that this loss of life is the reason for the 'blight' of the mid 21st century, and the genetic banks of these 'mad scientists' may well have been what gave rise to the killer moulds in the first place. More research is needed to confirm Dr Marx ideas, but it does seem that he has a very strong argument so far.
As Nathaniel Jackson the famous Australian pilot and the first man on Mars was once quoted as saying to his mirror.
"Who made who? Well do me in, man - we KNOW it wasn't you!"
This except is from a larger work of satirical 'prehistory' by your most Faustian author.
This section deals with gay rights and homosexuality.
No names or places are intentionally linked to real people or events.
The work is simply fiction, and written for the explicit purpose of providing a provocative double take on our direction as a culture in an entertaining way.I hope the readers 'get it' for what it is - a stance AGAINST bigotry and murder dressed as science and medicine.
Tuesday, May 08, 2012
South Korea finds smuggled capsules contain human flesh
One of the most disturbing media-feeds I have read in ages.
Here we see the 'product' of the infanticide industry. No longer content with the forced killing of millions of Chinese infants (mostly girls of course) it seems the 'product' of that industry is becoming more and more available overseas. First it was in the form of stem cells, but those can now be made from other more morally palatable sources. Now the 'product' (dead infant flesh) is making it's way back to it's roots: Cannibalism.
People are EATING them in pieces and in capsules.
While western politicians play friendly with this regime praising them for their eugenics programs; these evil swines are taking women's baby girls, killing them, and FEEDING them to cannibal savages who think it is beneficial to ingest newborn or unborn baby flesh - for a profit.
Also found on CTV.
The Associated Press
Updated: Mon. May. 7 2012 10:26 PM ET
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea has seized thousands of smuggled drug capsules filled with powdered flesh from dead babies, which some people believe can cure disease, officials said Monday.
The capsules were made in northeastern China from babies whose bodies were chopped into small pieces and dried on stoves before being turned into powder, the Korea Customs Service said.
Customs officials refused to say where the dead babies came from or who made the capsules, citing possible diplomatic friction with Beijing. Chinese officials ordered an investigation into the production of drugs made from dead fetuses or newborns last year.
The customs office has discovered 35 smuggling attempts since August of about 17,450 capsules disguised as stamina boosters, and some people believe them to be a panacea for disease, the customs service said in a statement. The capsules of human flesh, however, contained bacteria and other harmful ingredients.
The smugglers told customs officials they believed the capsules were ordinary stamina boosters and did not know the ingredients or manufacturing process.
Ethnic Koreans from northeastern China who now live in South Korea were intending to use the capsules themselves or share them with other Korean-Chinese, a customs official said. They were carried in luggage or sent by international mail.
The capsules were all confiscated but no one has been punished because the amount was deemed small and they weren't intended for sale, said the customs official, who requested anonymity, citing department rules.
China's State Food and Drug Administration and its Health Ministry did not immediately respond to questions faxed to them Monday. Chinese media identify northeastern China as the source of such products, especially Jilin province which abuts North Korea.
The Jilin food and drug safety agency is responsible for investigating the trade of such remains there. Calls to the agency and to the information office of Jilin's Communist Party were not answered Monday.
The South Korean customs agency began investigating after receiving a tip a year ago. No sicknesses have been reported from ingesting the capsules.
No sickness? Sickness of the soul: EVIL.
Here we see the 'product' of the infanticide industry. No longer content with the forced killing of millions of Chinese infants (mostly girls of course) it seems the 'product' of that industry is becoming more and more available overseas. First it was in the form of stem cells, but those can now be made from other more morally palatable sources. Now the 'product' (dead infant flesh) is making it's way back to it's roots: Cannibalism.
People are EATING them in pieces and in capsules.
While western politicians play friendly with this regime praising them for their eugenics programs; these evil swines are taking women's baby girls, killing them, and FEEDING them to cannibal savages who think it is beneficial to ingest newborn or unborn baby flesh - for a profit.
Also found on CTV.
The Associated Press
Updated: Mon. May. 7 2012 10:26 PM ET
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea has seized thousands of smuggled drug capsules filled with powdered flesh from dead babies, which some people believe can cure disease, officials said Monday.
The capsules were made in northeastern China from babies whose bodies were chopped into small pieces and dried on stoves before being turned into powder, the Korea Customs Service said.
Customs officials refused to say where the dead babies came from or who made the capsules, citing possible diplomatic friction with Beijing. Chinese officials ordered an investigation into the production of drugs made from dead fetuses or newborns last year.
The customs office has discovered 35 smuggling attempts since August of about 17,450 capsules disguised as stamina boosters, and some people believe them to be a panacea for disease, the customs service said in a statement. The capsules of human flesh, however, contained bacteria and other harmful ingredients.
The smugglers told customs officials they believed the capsules were ordinary stamina boosters and did not know the ingredients or manufacturing process.
Ethnic Koreans from northeastern China who now live in South Korea were intending to use the capsules themselves or share them with other Korean-Chinese, a customs official said. They were carried in luggage or sent by international mail.
The capsules were all confiscated but no one has been punished because the amount was deemed small and they weren't intended for sale, said the customs official, who requested anonymity, citing department rules.
China's State Food and Drug Administration and its Health Ministry did not immediately respond to questions faxed to them Monday. Chinese media identify northeastern China as the source of such products, especially Jilin province which abuts North Korea.
The Jilin food and drug safety agency is responsible for investigating the trade of such remains there. Calls to the agency and to the information office of Jilin's Communist Party were not answered Monday.
The South Korean customs agency began investigating after receiving a tip a year ago. No sicknesses have been reported from ingesting the capsules.
No sickness? Sickness of the soul: EVIL.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)